As such assembly, was illegal
Malaysian Authority must punish these assembly
But of cause not all the demo,s
The authority lawfull must arrests
Ans the law must made a deterrent punishment
To the organizer , the outspoken spokesmen to the media
As such assmbly is illegal,
Their pre arrangement to the media is also illegal
Despite of what they term as democratic voice

As in the voice is not democratic
This voice is a National Threats
This voice will create chaos to our Nation
This voice is alike of United States Voice
It,s a voice to bring down a Nation

15. http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/5/16/nation/11296180&sec=nation

16. Temporary promoter hired by foreigners are being paid for RM12 per hour + transport and makan allowance as long as they are fit the job and do not steal and ponteng.

17. The local employers pay us peanuts and expect us to work as dignified staffs.

18. To these employers, they are timid and kedekut businessmen who think that employees shall wait for them to offer good gaji to support the increasing high living standard.

19. Anyway, Malaysia economy is booming.

20. If they don’t pay well, they will have to confront with labour shortage.

21. Emerging economy never works in Malaysia because of her small population and multi-culture ethnic.

22. If they pay peanuts, then they can only get monkeys.

23. When shall the leaf fall, YAB?

Good day, YAB.

1. Daun sireh tu daun sireh.

2. A spade is a spade.

3. Did Tun Dr MM and BN approve for 1 country, 2 political systems behind closed door after 1997 financial crisis, Anwar’s suspected sodomy, 911, SAR, Aceh Tsunami etc….

4. Pak Lah was appointed and approved by BN to replace Tun Dr MM when the doctor won GE11th in 2001.

5. Pak Lah pushed for Islam Hadhari, BN lost 4 states on Mar 8, 2008 because of who you know, not whom you know.

6. Anwar, Tok Nik and Hadi Awang pushed for Islam Hukum Hudud, PAS shall loss Kelantan and states ruled by opposition now.

7. I am wondering, if Hukum Hudud is implemented in Kelantan, when Muslims steal in a shopping mall caught by PAS Hukum Hudud officers and is proven of stealing, the thief shall be potong tangan in padang PAS by the head of religion?

8. Guan Eng is not fit to lead DAP because he got carried away with emotion.

9. Call for GE13, the non-Muslims will show Tok Nik, Hadi Awang and Anwar way out back to where they belong, habis cerita.

10. Lee Kuan Yew is a not a corrupted shark that jaga the image of shark.

11. Is our corrupted sharks are protected by Islam and bangsa seperti Amerika?

12. PM Najib shall got the mandate in GE13th even if he calls the general election now because he is dealing with people who is alive.

13. Once PM Najib got BN mandate to do what is right, no one would want to join Bersih to anti-government.

Good day, YAB.

Saya mewakil 365orang pegawai kerajaan berstatus ‘Contract For Services’ memohon Tun dapat memberi pandangan tentang
bidang teknikal di Malaysia.

Zaman Tun memerintah dahulu, pembangunan sangat pesat dan banyak projek-projek mega kerajaan sehingga bidang teknikal (arkitek, jurutera awam, mekanikal, elektrik dan ukur bahan) dipandang tinggi pada generasi itu.

Namun kini suara-suara muda kami dipinggirkan dan dinafikan hak (tiada kwsp, tiada GL untuk keluarga, pelbagai) dimana terdapat dalam perjanjian berat sebelah kepada pegawai atasan yang mengambil kesempatan di atas tenaga kami.

Berikut salah satu rintihan kami pada Menteri Kerja Raya, Datuk Seri Shaziman Abu Mansor pada isu (‘Contract For Services dantara KKR dan SPA yang berlarutan tanpa penyelesaian dan juga hak-hak kami sebahagai pekerja) yang tidak pernah dipandang dan jawapan hanya lepas punggung sahaja.

+++++++++++++++
BAGI menjayakan pembangunan negara, lebih 600 graduan lulusan ijazah dalam bidang Kejuruteraan Awam, Kejuruteraan Mekanikal, Kejuruteraan Elektrik dan Ukur Bahan telah diambil oleh kerajaan bagi mengisi kekosongan jawatan secara Contract For Service (CFS) di Kementerian Kerja Raya di seluruh negara pada awal 2009.

Saya bersyukur kerana termasuk dalam salah seorang daripada mereka yang ditempatkan berkhidmat di cawangan, bahagian dan pejabat JKR negeri bagi membantu menyiapkan projek mega kerajaan, termasuk pembinaan lebuh raya dan sebagainya.

Oleh kerana kami merupakan pegawai yang berkhidmat secara CFS yang diletakkan di bawah Gred J41, kami hanya diberikan gaji dengan tiada kenaikan (statik). Kami tidak mendapat kemudahan untuk Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja (KWSP) tetapi dibenarkan membuat tuntutan perjalanan atau harian sekiranya diarah bertugas di tempat projek.

Apa yang menyedihkan kami semua, setelah hampir tiga tahun berkhidmat secara CFS, kami yang kebanyakan mengendalikan projek penting di negeri kekal sebagai pegawai kontrak yang masih tidak diserapkan ke jawatan tetap sebagaimana yang dijanjikan sebelumnya.

Lebih menghampakan ialah walaupun kami diletakkan sebagai pegawai tadbir yang diberikan tanggungjawab mengendalikan pekerja bawahan, gaji yang diterima jelas tidak setimpal dengan kerja terlalu berat yang lakukan. Kadangkala kekurangan wang (sebelum gaji diterima dan ketiadaan kenderaan pejabat) apabila ditugaskan memantau projek di satu-satu tempat yang lokasinya jauh dari pejabat.

Kadangkala kami terpaksa pula mewakili ketua tempat kami bertugas untuk hadir ke mesyuarat di ibu negara menggunakan wang saku sendiri sebelum dibayar ganti.

Jadi saya merayu kepada kerajaan supaya dapat mempertimbangkan kedudukan kami memandangkan kontrak perkhidmatan kami yang akan tamat pada hujung tahun ini.

Bagi mewakili rakan-rakan lain yang kini dalam dilema tentang masa depan, kami sangat berharap Menteri Kerja Raya, Datuk Seri Shaziman Abu Mansor memberikan perhatian kepada nasib kami dengan harapan kami dipanggil untuk temuduga untuk ke jawatan tetap seperti yang dijanjikan.

Kami adalah golongan yang membantu projek membina negara. Oleh itu pertimbangkan nasib kami.

++++++++++++++
Terima kasih Tun.

Ini lah wira dunia dan wira kami rakyat malaysia.insyaallah… mudahan allah swt memberi nikmat bahagia hidup di dunia dan akhirat pada beliau dan keluarga.amin

Thank you for a good posting again. Let us continue to offer advice and argument for the sake of the well being of the people.. We have to continue to be patient and soldier on. My preference is different as compared to that of the present government. The present government is very patient and tolerant of the Opposition and illegal street demonstrations. They are too soft and careful. My approach is the same like yours, Tun. You and I follow the same philosophy. Spare the cane, spoil the child. I would suggest the government take the following steps to deal with the evil, spiteful opposition parties and their Indian female supporters, Ambiga and Irene Fernandez

1. Send our Attorney General, Abdul Ghani Patail to Singapore to learn from Lee Kuan Yew the finer points to sue the opposition and the so called alternative media and irresponsible individuals like Ambiga and Irene Fernandez. These people have been accusing the government of all sorts of crimes without any basis or proofs.

2. Send our Police Director of internal Security to China to study how so effectively they dealt with the student demonstrations at Tiennanmen Square. The Chinese Police use battle tanks and live bullets to shoot and crush the demonstrators. Subsequently, hunt them down in their houses and prosecute them and lock them up in jail for long period.

Either we choose democracy through general election in a lawful and peaceful manner or we form the government by overthrowing the democratically elected government of the day, by agitating in street demonstration.

amin tan

It is very easy to create suspicion. It is the nature of human being to be curious. By creating impression that the election is unfair and violence is used to retain power, any kind of government will fall. Mark the word impression, it does not necessarily mean concrete fact.

It has been a patern in all other Arab Spring and Asian Summer movement that the Government are cruel, oppresive, unfair and undemocratic. It is about revolution of democracy. When this is painted so dark and gloomy, it exceed the actual fact.

The fact that Government of Malaysia has manage to develop the country from scratch to progressivley developed country out of so many other countries in the world will tend to be ignored out of anger due to the bad impression created by the media. People will get divided and slowly the country will complete its Asian Summer process.

As a citizen, I am open to an idea of change. But I have never been convinced on the idea that the other is supposedly the better. I read the contentions made by the Oppsotion and data produced by them about Bersih. I read the explaination from the EC. There are so many accusation flying here and there.

It is intense political activties going on. I tell you it raises more and more doubts even on the data produced by the Opposition itself. The fact that the Opposition is championing the Bersih fight has never ever been considered as to be politically hijacked by average people.

If you ask me it is a very clear ‘war of impression’ happening in this country. There has been so many debates in the world that things measured through impression may not necessarily represent actual facts.

Examine things academically and objectively, despite all the talks, there has been no proven case in court and the Opposition has been given all access on the election control process , results review and vote recounts. In addition to this, the improvement process has been accomodated and is being progressively discussed and executed.

Was it really necessary to riot or frequent massive street demonstration? If we destroy this country through unlawful means, was it a guarantee that we are going to get more than what we used to have?

I admit there may be other countries that is better than Malaysia. But we must not reject the fact that we are also better than average countries.

See the world not just one country nor continent, both sides of the world and you may see clearer. The best fact is that, it is my country and I love my country.

Didn’t we all?

I remembered, long time ago you did mention that the secret of this success was..because of…BN.

Bersih is demonstration organised by NGOs with the aim for the government particularly the Suruhanjaya Pilihanraya (SPR) to clean up the electorate databank as well as the election process. Citing a study done by academics as the basis for their demand, there is approximate 40,000 irregular voters. This amount is considered small considering the total registered voters 12 million. The NGOs are saying although the amount is small in terms of (0.3%), considering last PRU, small margins can make a difference of who wins or loses.

I am of the opinion there is no such thing as a perfect voting system. Even in the United States, in the Bush vs John Kerry Presidential Campaign in 2004, when they used high tech electronic voting machine, they still had to do a recount. Each time there was a recount a new number appeared. In the end, Bush won since each time the recount was done, Bush obtain the majority even if each time the recount showed a different no.

If the electoral system is flawed, therefore the United States should not have a President? Judging from the Bersih, this is probably what they wanted.

Until the electoral sytem is “Bersih”, there should be no Prime Minister to govern the country.

In my opinion, there is no such thing as a perfect system. Due to the inherent weakness of any system, we rely on managing risks. For example, no companies would dare declare their audited financial statements is accurate. Why? Because they know due to the inherent weakness in the the audited financial statement can maybe inaccurate, altought the inaccuracy is very immatarial, ie will not affect decision of financial users in their decision. Thus, they use the term the financial statements show “a true and fair view” instead of “true and accurate view”.

That is why companies have internal and external auditors to check on the system regularly to detect these errors so that the errors would be at a minimal level. Same thing goes for factories, there are regular checks done by the authorities to ensure that the factory is safe.

Even with this auditing and checking, there are still mistakes and flaws be it in the factories, audit financial statements, etc.

Does this mean companies should stop producing audited financial statements and factories should close down until a perfect system can be found to rectify this problem?

Then there is our infamous traffic accidents that causes death in the thousands every year. Should we ban driving as well until a perfect system is found that does not cause any more death?

I even heard they even have a statics on a probablity you can get struck down by lightning if you get out of the house. Does this mean should always stay indoor because of the risk of getting struck by lightning?

Similarly there is also the risk of planes going down even if all the precautionary measure are in place. Does this mean we should ban flying plane as well?

The point I wanted to say, all the above have systems, be it electoral system, financial systems, factory process systems, car traffic system, flight system,etc. All the systems are imperfect, but we still need them to carry on with our daily lives.

What we do is we manage the risk to ensure the system does not malfunction or not do what is was supposed to do. Having said that, the irregularities of 40,000 voters, to me is insignificant given the fact there is no perfect system. What the SPR should do is, any irregularites that is found, then rectify it. There will continue to be irregularites but do internal audit checks to keep it at a minimal.

I thank the NGOs that organise the Bersih for finding the irregularities which I think is more of admin work that could have been done by SPR internal audit team. So thank you for the admin work.

What would be an issue is there is clear tempering of the electoral database, not some irregular due to the inherent weakness of the system. If there is, then it is a different matter altogether, something which the NGOs for Bersih have fail to prove.